Industry 4.0 - Risks
I do not want that
It's about the risks of networking. Of course, no Facebook scolding, although the actually is urgently needed. But would not fit to the overall theme 'Industry 4.0'. The topic should be treated a little more comprehensive than
'just' to shed light on the Internet. But it must also be clear, almost nothing in the Internet is really safe from access by third parties, not even the connecting computer and its network itself.
Because leading companies in a technology could almost always count on that. Until imitators the specific features of products had found out, they themselves were already one step ahead and thus secured their lead. If
now however a complete company structure and almost all patents are available at least via malicious software, this projection melts away.
If already networking seems to be one of the highest goods of industrial nations, then why the all-important management does not deal even more intense with the concerns of IT professionals? Not to block restrictive all,
but carefully weigh the risks against the benefits. But unfortunately the term 'networking' by itself seems to overcome all concerns.
There are already whole generations of crosslinkers. Detractors say that they could not do anything by themselves. Perhaps there is too much of everything meanwhile. Let's recognize that the industry has discouraged us,
inter alia, with a perfect finish. In addition, there is hardly any real lack of money, therefore no need to help themselves. And some say to earn money, too many people look on the clock instead on the work.
No, you can still make some by yourself, especially obviously many people e.g. Sundays do not know what to do with their time. Even on the car that's possible, of course, not necessarily on Sundays. Where are your winter
tyres? Somewhere placed into stock at the merchant`s. If the snow comes down relatively quickly, there are even waiting times. Agreed, you have to inform a lot more these days in order to be able to perform such a work
professionally.
However, if you look at the picture above, some contribution to the discussion makes itself superfluous. Is that on the poster at all a contribution to the discussion? Or maybe its end? In fact, build up is so much harder than
break off, to be against something so much more easily than to develop something new. Not that we are so unconditionally for the TTIP Agreement and especially its secrecy, but 'I do not want that' is also no solution. 10/15
| 
